TodayTopicsWritersPodcastsMagazineMoreSearchAccount

Tuesday

10 May 2016

Was it wise for Cameron to bring up the ‘fantastically corrupt’?

Was it wise for Cameron to bring up the ‘fantastically corrupt’?

Was it wise for Cameron to bring up the ‘fantastically corrupt’?

David Cameron was today caught describing Nigeria to the Queen as ‘fantastically corrupt’. But after the Panama Papers leak, the Prime Minister may want to choose his words more carefully: after all, that accolade could easily belong closer to home. Your average dodgy Nigerian oil baron and big-time British fraudster have much in common; a shared love of champagne, a doctor in Harley Street and… a little company based off-shore in a tax haven whose sole purpose is to hide stolen fortunes. And in most cases, that tax haven is one of ‘ours’ - either a British Overseas Territory or a Crown Dependency. Half of the companies featured in the Panama Papers were registered in British-administered tax havens.  These overseas territories vary in the degree of venality and abuse they accommodate but collectively they are dragging our British brand through the mud.

Was it wise for Cameron to bring up the ‘fantastically corrupt’?
Useful links
    Advertise with usSponsor an eventSubmit a storyCookie preferences
More from The Spectator
    Spectator AustraliaApollo MagazineThe Spectator Shop
About us
    About The SpectatorContact & FAQsPrivacy & cookiesTerms and conditionsJobs and vacanciesSite map
Subscribe
    Subscribe todaySign up to our emailsThe Spectator Club
Useful links
    Advertise with usSponsor an eventSubmit a storyCookie preferences
About us
    About The SpectatorContact & FAQsPrivacy & cookiesTerms and conditionsJobs and vacanciesSite map
More from The Spectator
    Spectator AustraliaApollo MagazineThe Spectator Shop
Subscribe
    Subscribe todaySign up to our emailsThe Spectator Club
Hidden Article